ENG 208: Composing the
Self
Professor
Richard Ruppel, Spring 2026
Office Hours: Monday (Smith 203) and Thursday (Smith 07), 8-9:30 am
Meetings: Wednesday, 4-6:50 pm, Doti 102
Phone: (714) 997-6754
(office)
Updated August 27, 2026
Weekly Syllabus
Assignments
Units
Canvas
Useful Links
EVENTS & ANNOUNCEMENTS
*As a student living in California, you
are eligible to vote using your home address or your school address.
To register to vote in California, click here.
I’ll add events throughout the semester, but if you know of other
announcements or events that might appear here, send them along to me.
Course
Description and Learning Outcomes: Flannery O’Conner, E. M.
Forster, and Joan Didion all wrote something to the effect that “I don’t know
what I think until I write it down.” An
equally valid corollary is “I don’t know what I don’t know until
I write it down.” Writing requires us to discover what we know but also, even
more importantly, what we don’t know.
Writing
also helps us discover who we are, as every diarist will confirm. But writing is more than “discovery.” Writing helps us create our identities. As
the title of this course suggests, writing helps us compose ourselves.
But
there’s a dark side to writing. In “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” a poem I
teach nearly every year, the mariner bites his arm and drinks his own blood so
that he can speak – a macabre tribute to the pain of tearing meaning out of the
chaos of the universe. The mariner of the
poem is an artist who is condemned to tell his story over and over, at great
cost to himself. Red Smith, a brilliant sportswriter, wrote “There’s nothing to
writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and open a vein.” Some
supremely talented people write and publish, publish and write, churning out
serviceable sentences, paragraphs, articles, and books effortlessly. For most
of us, writing is hard, painstaking, daunting, and humbling.
This
course will give us the space and time to discover what we know, what we don’t
know, and who we are through our writing.
We will read skilled authors who reveal themselves in their essays, and
we will do this ourselves, paying attention to the elements of rhetoric: tone,
audience, and purpose. We will begin writing brief autobiographies and then
move on to more public writing.
Course
Description & Objectives, from the Catalog: Students explore the relationship between identity and writing. Students
will study a variety of genres (personal essays, researched essays, academic
articles, news reports, case studies, and ethnographies) and theoretical
approaches to learn how and why writers create versions of themselves for
rhetorical effect. While investigating identity construction in writing,
students will hone their own rhetorical and stylistic skills. Students will
compose narratives, essays, reports, and multi-genre compositions, drawing from
personal experience, observation, and primary and secondary sources. The course
will also address the role of self in the research-writing process by requiring
students to conduct original academic research projects. This course is
appropriate for all majors, and no specialized writing experience is assumed.
ENG 208 satisfies Chapman’s Written Inquiry
General Education requirement. Here is the description of the learning
outcome associated with that requirement:
Students establish active, genuine, and
responsible authorial engagement; communicate a purpose—an argument or other
intentional point/goal; invoke a specific audience, develop the
argument/content with an internal logic-organization; integrate references,
citations, and source materials logically and dialogically, indicating how
forms of evidence relate to each other and the author’s position; and compose
the text with: a style or styles appropriate to the purpose and intended
audience, a consistent use of the diction appropriate to the author’s topic and
purpose. Students develop the ability to establish and vary authorial voice(s)
and tone(s), to choose form(s) and genre(s) appropriate to their purpose and
audience (forms may be digital and/or multimodal), and to make rhetorically
effective use of language.
Texts
& Supplies:
All readings will be online or in the
“Modules” section of our Canvas pages.
Course Requirements:
Attendance: Please make every effort to attend each
class. Let me know if you are unable to attend. If you miss more than one class, your grade
will suffer, and if you miss three or more, you will not pass.
Communication: Please
be courteous and constructive in our classes. I receive a large number of
emails, so when emailing, please identify the course (ENG 208), your last name,
and the subject in the subject line. I will respond promptly to your
emails; please respond promptly to mine.
Essays: Please email your essays
directly to my email: ruppel@chapman.edu. If possible, send them as MSWord
documents. If you send a pdf, I will
convert it to a Word document so I can mark it.
Please DO NOT send a link to a Google doc.
Late
essays will receive reduced grades, and I will not accept papers submitted more
than a week late unless you provide a convincing explanation. To pass this course, you must complete all four
essays. If you are having difficulty
completing an essay or a Canvas discussion post, let me know.
I will accept a revision of one of your essays, but you must
schedule a conference with me to discuss that revision before you submit
it. I will average the grade of the original paper and the revision.
I will both
grade and mark essays earning a grade of C- or higher. I will not put
a grade on an essay that earns a grade lower than C-. If I return an
essay to you that does not include a grade, you will need to schedule a meeting
with me so we can go over the essay together and work out a revision strategy.
I may ask you to schedule a consultation with the Writing
Center before our meeting.
Canvas Discussion Posts: I will
assign Canvas Discussion responses for many of the assigned readings. These
responses will be due before we discuss the readings.
Grades:
Autobiographical
Essay: 15% Due September 16—1500-2000 words.
“The Political is Personal”
essay: 20% October 9—1600-2400 words.
Essay concerned with
health: 25% Due November 4—1600-2400 words.
Final essay: 25% Due December 9—2800-3500 words.
Participation*: 15%
*This is primarily your grade on the Canvas Discussion Board posts
and workshop participation. Here are my criteria for evaluating your
posts:
I will post
grades in Canvas, which will calculate your overall grade for the class. The official
grades are those I calculate myself, and these are nearly always the same as
those Canvas creates. If there is a
discrepancy between the grade you see in Canvas and the grade I have in my
gradebook, however, the gradebook grade is the one that’s correct. I am always
happy to discuss assignment grades.
Chapman
University Academic Integrity Policy:
Chapman University is a community of scholars that emphasizes the
mutual responsibility of all members to seek knowledge honestly and in good
faith. Students are responsible for doing their own work, and academic
dishonesty of any kind will be subject to sanction by the instructor and
referral to the university's Academic Integrity Committee, which may impose
additional sanctions up to and including dismissal. (See the
"Undergraduate Catalog" for the full policy.) Though I am not requiring you to submit
your papers via Turnitin, I am an expert at finding sources, online and
otherwise, so I will notice if you make unacknowledged use of someone else’s
work. So please save both of us from trauma and write your Canvas
Discussion posts and essays yourself.
ChatGPT and other Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots:
1.
Typing a prompt into an
LLM chatbot, copying the response, and then submitting that response for an
assignment is an obvious form of academic misconduct. Don’t do it.
2.
Chatbots are sometimes inaccurate. When I asked for a biography of Richard
Ruppel, a Chapman English professor, a few years ago, I found that I was born
in Fairview (false), had been an expert on the Holocaust (mostly false), had
graduated from Yale and Harvard (false), and was now dead (demonstrably, I
hope, false). People in the field
describe these errors as “hallucinations,” and though ChatGPT now creates a
more accurate biography of Richard Ruppel, hallucinations are not uncommon. So
you must check their accuracy every time you consult one.
3. If I have reason to believe that an assignment does not represent
your own work, I may ask you to meet with me to discuss your writing, research,
and preparation. I may consider the assignment itself, your sources, drafts or
revision history, and your ability to explain and discuss the work you
submitted. If I determine that you have engaged in unauthorized use of AI or
otherwise violated academic-integrity standards, I am required to follow Chapman
University's academic-integrity procedures.
4.
Chatbots can be
inaccurate, but they do offer clear, useful information which users should
check. These are relatively early times,
but through this semester (and through your academic career) we will all
discover ways to help you use them to enhance your learning.
The following discussion of the use of LLMs in
academic settings was developed by Dr. Nora Rivera, a former professor in
Chapman’s English department. I have added some material:
|
Acceptable
Uses of LLMs |
Not
Acceptable Uses of LLMs |
|
·
To improve your work ·
To brainstorm ·
To explore potential counterarguments ·
To fine-tune research questions ·
To draft an outline to organize your
thoughts ·
To check grammar and style ·
To check format · To
translate words and phrases |
·
To replace your work ·
To cheat on the writing & research
process ·
To obtain answers to assessments ·
To generate a full draft of your work · To
generate large chunks of text with little or no input from you as an author |
·
Students must cite AI
technologies when appropriate (e.g., when using images
generated by AI technologies, when referencing an answer provided by AI
technologies, et cetera). Here’s a sample AI citation: “I consulted ChatGPT for
information the diagnosis and treatment of borderline behavior disorder. I checked the accuracy of that information in
a psychology journal article (cited in the paper), and I did not reproduce the
ChatGPT wording.”
·
Copying works entirely generated
by AI technologies and submitting them as original content is considered an academic integrity
violation
·
Always revise your work
before submitting it. You are responsible for any inaccurate, biased,
offensive, or otherwise unethical content you submit regardless of whether it
originally comes from you or an AI model.
In-Class
use of laptops, tablets, and phones:
You
may use a laptop only when it’s appropriate for that day’s class. Otherwise, laptops and tablets must remain closed, and you may
not consult your phone during class. If you have a reason to
use one of these devices during class, you must receive my permission to do so
beforehand. If I see you consulting your
phone during class, I will mark you absent.
However, I do know how difficult it can be to remain phone-free through
a class, so I will provide one or two five-minute breaks for you to tune in (or
use the restroom).
Chapman's
Students with Disabilities Policy:
In
compliance with ADA guidelines, students who have any condition, either
permanent or temporary, that might affect their ability to perform in this
class are encouraged to inform the instructor at the beginning of the term. The
University, through the Disability
Services Office, will work with the appropriate faculty member who is asked to
provide the accommodations for a student in determining what accommodations are
suitable based on the documentation and the individual student needs. The
granting of any accommodation will not be retroactive and cannot jeopardize the
academic standards or integrity of the course.
Please contact me if you have ANY concerns about completing any of the
requirements of this course. I want you to feel challenged, not
overwhelmed.
Chapman
University is committed to ensuring equality and valuing diversity. Students
and professors are reminded to show respect at all times as outlined in
Chapman’s Harassment and Discrimination Policy. Any violations
of this policy should be discussed with the professor, the Dean of Students
and/or otherwise reported in accordance with this policy.
Week
1 – August 26: Introductions and
conversations about composing the self.
Week 2 – September 2: Discussion
of essays on writing.
Week
3 – September 9: Draft workshop. Discussion
of composition and the use of AI with Jaime Campbell, Chapman’s Writing Center
Director
Week 4 – September
16: Autobiographical essay due September 16.
Week 5 – September 23: The political is
personal – discussions of essays devoted to how authors developed, maintained,
and/or changed their political positions.
Week
6 –
September 30: Visit by Professor Richard Bausch and continued discussion of
political essays.
Week 7 – October 7: Draft workshop. “The Political
is Personal” essay due October 9.
Week 8 – October 14: We’ll start in Argyros 201 and
hear Ryan Lee Wong give a talk asking “Which Side Are You On?”
Week
9 –
October 21: Discussion of health-related essays.
Week
10 –
October 28: Meet first in AF 209 for the Nadia Murad presentation followed
by a workshop back in our classroom of your health-related essay.
Week 11 – November 4: Health-related essay
due November 4.
Week 12 – November 11: Writing consultations.
Week
13 – November 18: In-class work on the last essay, including
consultations.
THANKSGIVING BREAK!
Week
14 – December 2: Draft workshop. Final essay due December
9.
Week
15 – Final: December 9, 4:15.
*This syllabus will change, but I will give you plenty of notice,
and I will keep the syllabus updated on the Web.
For
Wednesday, August 26: Course introduction. We’ll
introduce ourselves and go over this Web page and our Canvas pages. Read through
our syllabus and bring questions, comments, and suggestions to class.
For
Wednesday, September 2: Read “Why
I Write” by George Orwell, “Why I Write” by Joan Didion, “Shitty First Drafts,” by Anne Lamott, and “Mother Tongue,”
by Amy Tan.
These are in the Modules section of
Canvas. Bring
ideas for your first essay and respond to the discussion
question in Canvas by 10am September 2.
Be sure to clear your first essay topic with me by Friday, September 4.
George
Orwell (1903-1950)
·
Brief
video
biography of Orwell from “School of Life,” 2016.
·
“Shooting
an Elephant,” 1936.
Joan Didion (1934-2021)
·
PBS tribute to Didion
after her death in 2021, at the age of 87, from Parkinson’s.
Anne Lamott (1954)
·
A Ted talk by Anne
Lamott.
·
A recent interview.
Amy Tan (1952)
·
Writing from personal
experience.
·
A quick PBS piece on Amy
Tan’s mother and her effect on Tan’s writing.
Eugene V.
Debs (1855-1926)
·
Brief video about the
Eugene V. Debs museum on the campus of Indiana State University.
Martin Luther
King Jr.
·
Brief video about King’s
early doubts and success.
Richard
Branson
·
Blog
post on the death penalty.
Beth Macy
·
NYT op/ed on J. D. Vance and how each Macy and Vance characterize
the problems of their rural Ohio origins.
Carol
Hanisch
·
The
original “The
Political is Personal” essay, from 1969, with a 2006 update.
Dennis Fox
·
Border Lines and Border
Regions
Tonya Allen
·
LA
Times interview.
·
Video interview about
her collection of stories: Fiona & Jane.
·
Bouncy
official trailer for Fiona
& Jane.
Oliver Sacks
·
Video about Clive
Wearing.
·
Sacks
discussing
his schizophrenic brother.
·
A
Sacks TED talk on
hallucinations.
Chang-rae
Lee
·
A
charming interview by
Ann Patchett.
Cell Phone
Use articles